Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of PythonPort/Process


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Oct 10, 2007, 2:19:07 PM (18 years ago)
Author:
ghost
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • PythonPort/Process

    v1 v1  
     1
     2= Boost.Build Python porting process =
     3
     4The Boost.Build Python porting was started by Pedro Ferreira in 2005. Quite a number
     5of modules was ported, but final integration was not performed. This revival of this
     6project therefore needs to:
     7
     8  * Examine modules Pedro has ported, compare it with Boost.Build Jam mainline, and produce up-to-date version.
     9  * Port modules that were never ported.
     10
     11To track what's ported and what's not, we just a comments at top of Python module. If a module has a
     12comment in the form:
     13{{{
     14# Status: being ported by <XXX>
     15}}}
     16it means it's in the process of being ported by XXX.
     17
     18If a module has a comment:
     19{{{
     20# Status: ported
     21}}}
     22then it's fully ported.
     23
     24Finally, if a Python module exists but has no comment of the above forms, it has to be compared with SVN HEAD jam code and updated -- or reported from scratch, if you're so inclined. If a Python module for some Jam module does not exists, it clearly should be ported.
     25
     26== Guidelines ==
     27
     28Some of important guidelines are:
     29
     30  * No design changes whatsoever, except as documented in PythonPort/Design. We'll have enough fun debugging the port to afford debugging not only port, but also design changes at the same time.
     31  * If it's not possible to port something because another module is not yet up-to-date, leave "FIXME" comment, telling what's needed to be done.
     32  * If you start work on a module, please add a "# Status:" comment and immediately commit, so that others don't try to port it at the same time.